Demographics details for Redford, MI vs Mccomb, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redford, MI vs Mccomb, MS.
| Data | Redford | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 46,899 | 12,041 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,000 | $37,288 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Redford vs Mccomb
- In Redford, the population is higher at 46,899, compared to 12,041 in Mccomb.
- Residents in Redford have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 36.8 years in Mccomb.
- Redford has a higher median income of $59,000 compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Redford at 57.0% compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccomb at 22%, compared to 10% in Redford.
- Mccomb has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.8% in Redford.
Demographics
Demographics Redford vs Mccomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Redford | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 75 |
| White | 74 | 22 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Redford vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 75% compared to 17% in Redford.
- Redford has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- The Asian population is larger in Redford at 4% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Redford at 5% compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Redford at 5% compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Redford at 1% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Redford | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 10.8% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 48.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redford vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccomb at 24.3% versus 0.0% in Redford.
- Mccomb has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mccomb at 10.8% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- Mccomb has higher obesity rates at 48.5% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Redford | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (81) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 22.1% (2,666) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.2% (1,349) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.1% (1,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redford vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- In Mccomb, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccomb at 11.2%, compared to 0.0% in Redford.
- In Mccomb, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Redford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.