Demographics details for Redfield, IA vs Wapakoneta, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redfield, IA vs Wapakoneta, OH.
| Data | Redfield | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 730 | 9,776 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 41.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,125 | $63,008 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Redfield vs Wapakoneta
- The population in Wapakoneta is higher at 9,776, compared to 730 in Redfield.
- The median age in Wapakoneta is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 32.6 years in Redfield.
- Redfield has a higher median income of $68,125 compared to $63,008 in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Redfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Wapakoneta at 10%, compared to 6% in Redfield.
- Wapakoneta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Redfield.
Demographics
Demographics Redfield vs Wapakoneta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Redfield | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 92 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Redfield vs Wapakoneta
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Redfield and Wapakoneta at 1%.
- Redfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 89% in Wapakoneta.
- Both Redfield and Wapakoneta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Wapakoneta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Redfield.
- Both Redfield and Wapakoneta have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Redfield and Wapakoneta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Redfield | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redfield vs Wapakoneta
- In Wapakoneta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.4% in Redfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wapakoneta at 23.8% versus 18.9% in Redfield.
- Wapakoneta has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 14.2% in Redfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Redfield at 23.8% compared to 18.8% in Wapakoneta.
- Wapakoneta has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 37.4% in Redfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Redfield at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Wapakoneta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Redfield | Wapakoneta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (7) | 0.1% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (178) | 26.9% (2,625) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (56) | 11.8% (1,157) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (59) | 14.0% (1,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redfield vs Wapakoneta
- A higher percentage of residents in Redfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
- In Wapakoneta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 24.4% in Redfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wapakoneta at 11.8%, compared to 7.7% in Redfield.
- In Wapakoneta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 8.1% in Redfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.