Demographics details for Redfield, IA vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Redfield, IA vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Redfield South san francisco
Population 730 63,484
Median Age 32.6 years 42.3 years
Median Income $68,125 $127,062
Married Families 38.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Redfield vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 730 in Redfield.
  • The median age in South san francisco is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 32.6 years in Redfield.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $68,125 in Redfield.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Redfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in South san francisco at 8%, compared to 6% in Redfield.
  • South san francisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.0% in Redfield.

Demographics

Demographics Redfield vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Redfield South san francisco
Black 1 2
White 92 11
Asian Data is updating 45
Hispanic 2 30
Two or More Races 5 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Redfield vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Redfield.
  • Redfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 0% in Redfield.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 2% in Redfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 5% in Redfield.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Redfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Redfield South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.9% 8.8%
Depression 18.9% 13.7%
Smoking 14.2% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 23.8% 14.5%
Obesity 37.4% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Redfield vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Redfield report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Redfield at 18.9% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Redfield at 14.2% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Redfield at 23.8% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Redfield at 37.4% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Redfield at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in South san francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Redfield South san francisco
No Schooling 1.0% (7) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 24.4% (178) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 7.7% (56) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.1% (59) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Redfield vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.0% in Redfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Redfield hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South san francisco at 14.8%, compared to 7.7% in Redfield.
  • In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 8.1% in Redfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.