Demographics details for Redfield, IA vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redfield, IA vs Mcpherson, KS.
| Data | Redfield | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 730 | 13,865 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 36.2 years |
| Median Income | $68,125 | $69,807 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Redfield vs Mcpherson
- The population in Mcpherson is higher at 13,865, compared to 730 in Redfield.
- The median age in Mcpherson is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 32.6 years in Redfield.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $68,125 in Redfield.
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Redfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Mcpherson at 9%, compared to 6% in Redfield.
- Mcpherson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Redfield.
Demographics
Demographics Redfield vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Redfield | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Redfield vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Redfield.
- Redfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 87% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Redfield.
- Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Redfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Redfield at 5% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Redfield and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Redfield | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.8% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redfield vs Mcpherson
- In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.4% in Redfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mcpherson at 20.1% versus 18.9% in Redfield.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Redfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Redfield at 23.8% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Redfield at 37.4% compared to 36.6% in Mcpherson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Redfield at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Mcpherson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Redfield | Mcpherson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (7) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (178) | 12.8% (1,775) |
| Less than High School | 7.7% (56) | 5.8% (804) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (59) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redfield vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Redfield have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Redfield hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 12.8% in Mcpherson.
- More residents in Redfield have less than a high school education at 7.7% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 8.1% in Redfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.