Demographics details for Redding, CA vs Safford, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redding, CA vs Safford, AZ.
Data | Redding | Safford |
---|---|---|
Population | 92,906 | 10,297 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 31.6 years |
Median Income | $67,323 | $64,860 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Redding vs Safford
- In Redding, the population is higher at 92,906, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- Residents in Redding have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Redding has a higher median income of $67,323 compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Redding at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- Redding has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Safford.
- The unemployment rate in Redding is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Redding vs Safford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Redding | Safford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 71 | 31 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 50 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 15 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Redding vs Safford
- In Safford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Redding.
- Redding has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 31% in Safford.
- The Asian population is larger in Redding at 4% compared to 1% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 12% in Redding.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Safford at 15%, compared to 10% in Redding.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Redding at 2% compared to 1% in Safford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Redding | Safford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.2% |
Depression | 22.1% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 16.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redding vs Safford
- More residents in Redding report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Redding at 22.1% compared to 19.9% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Redding.
- Binge drinking is more common in Redding at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Safford has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 30.9% in Redding.
- Disability percentages are higher in Redding at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Redding | Safford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (581) | 2.7% (274) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (13,235) | 11.1% (1,147) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (8,540) | 17.7% (1,825) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (16,986) | 10.6% (1,092) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redding vs Safford
- In Safford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Redding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Redding hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Safford at 17.7%, compared to 9.2% in Redding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Redding hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.