Demographics details for Redding, CA vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redding, CA vs Gresham, OR.
Data | Redding | Gresham |
---|---|---|
Population | 92,906 | 111,621 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $67,323 | $69,437 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Redding vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 92,906 in Redding.
- Residents in Redding have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $67,323 in Redding.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Redding.
- The poverty level is identical in both Redding and Gresham at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Redding is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Redding vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Redding | Gresham |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 4 |
White | 71 | 55 |
Asian | 4 | 5 |
Hispanic | 12 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 13 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Redding vs Gresham
- In Gresham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Redding.
- Redding has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Redding.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 12% in Redding.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 10% in Redding.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Redding at 2% compared to 1% in Gresham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Redding | Gresham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.3% |
Depression | 22.1% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 20.2% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redding vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Redding.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 22.1% in Redding.
- Gresham has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 15.0% in Redding.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 17.6% in Redding.
- Obesity rates are higher in Redding at 30.9% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Redding at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Redding | Gresham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (581) | 1.6% (1,757) |
High School Diploma | 14.2% (13,235) | 15.0% (16,776) |
Less than High School | 9.2% (8,540) | 16.5% (18,399) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (16,986) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redding vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Redding.
- In Gresham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Redding.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 9.2% in Redding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Redding hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Gresham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.