Demographics details for Red wing, MN vs Meadville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red wing, MN vs Meadville, PA.
Data | Red wing | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,672 | 12,680 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $65,107 | $46,157 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Red wing vs Meadville
- In Red wing, the population is higher at 16,672, compared to 12,680 in Meadville.
- Residents in Red wing have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 35.7 years in Meadville.
- Red wing has a higher median income of $65,107 compared to $46,157 in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Red wing at 40.0% compared to 27.0% in Meadville.
- The poverty level is higher in Meadville at 12%, compared to 8% in Red wing.
- Meadville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.7% in Red wing.
Demographics
Demographics Red wing vs Meadville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Red wing | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 86 | 86 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red wing vs Meadville
- In Meadville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Red wing.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Red wing and Meadville at 86%.
- Both Red wing and Meadville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Red wing at 5% compared to 2% in Meadville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meadville at 6%, compared to 3% in Red wing.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Red wing at 2% compared to 0% in Meadville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Red wing | Meadville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 14.0% |
Depression | 23.4% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 24.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red wing vs Meadville
- In Meadville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.9% in Red wing.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Meadville at 26.6% versus 23.4% in Red wing.
- Meadville has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 17.8% in Red wing.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red wing at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Meadville.
- Meadville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 38.6% in Red wing.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Meadville at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Red wing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Red wing | Meadville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (98) | 0.2% (29) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (3,441) | 24.5% (3,110) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (1,617) | 8.6% (1,085) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,232) | 15.4% (1,953) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red wing vs Meadville
- A higher percentage of residents in Red wing have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Meadville.
- In Meadville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.5% compared to 20.6% in Red wing.
- More residents in Red wing have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 8.6% in Meadville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red wing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 15.4% in Meadville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.