Demographics details for Red wing, MN vs Hampton, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red wing, MN vs Hampton, VA.
| Data | Red wing | Hampton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,672 | 138,037 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $65,107 | $64,430 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Red wing vs Hampton
- The population in Hampton is higher at 138,037, compared to 16,672 in Red wing.
- Residents in Red wing have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 36.5 years in Hampton.
- Red wing has a higher median income of $65,107 compared to $64,430 in Hampton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Red wing at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Hampton.
- The poverty level is higher in Hampton at 12%, compared to 8% in Red wing.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Red wing and Hampton at 3.7%.
Demographics
Demographics Red wing vs Hampton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red wing | Hampton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 49 |
| White | 86 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red wing vs Hampton
- In Hampton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 3% in Red wing.
- Red wing has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 34% in Hampton.
- In Hampton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Red wing.
- Hampton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Red wing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hampton at 8%, compared to 3% in Red wing.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Red wing at 2% compared to 0% in Hampton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red wing | Hampton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.8% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red wing vs Hampton
- In Hampton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Red wing.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red wing at 23.4% compared to 21.1% in Hampton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Red wing at 17.8% compared to 17.7% in Hampton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red wing at 19.1% compared to 15.2% in Hampton.
- Hampton has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 38.6% in Red wing.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hampton at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Red wing.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red wing | Hampton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (98) | 0.7% (1,033) |
| High School Diploma | 20.6% (3,441) | 16.8% (23,123) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (1,617) | 7.0% (9,612) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,232) | 18.5% (25,602) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red wing vs Hampton
- In Hampton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Red wing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red wing hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in Hampton.
- More residents in Red wing have less than a high school education at 9.7% compared to 7.0% in Hampton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red wing hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 18.5% in Hampton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.