Demographics details for Red wing, MN vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red wing, MN vs Chicago, IL.
Data | Red wing | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,672 | 2,665,039 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $65,107 | $71,673 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Red wing vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 16,672 in Red wing.
- Residents in Red wing have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673, compared to $65,107 in Red wing.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Red wing at 40.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 8% in Red wing.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 3.7% in Red wing.
Demographics
Demographics Red wing vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Red wing | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 29 |
White | 86 | 23 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 5 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Red wing vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 3% in Red wing.
- Red wing has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Red wing.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Red wing.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 3% in Red wing.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Red wing at 2% compared to 1% in Chicago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Red wing | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.6% |
Depression | 23.4% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 17.8% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red wing vs Chicago
- More residents in Red wing report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red wing at 23.4% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Red wing at 17.8% compared to 15.1% in Chicago.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red wing at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Obesity rates are higher in Red wing at 38.6% compared to 34.1% in Chicago.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Red wing and Chicago at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Red wing | Chicago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (98) | 1.7% (44,697) |
High School Diploma | 20.6% (3,441) | 13.3% (354,780) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (1,617) | 15.8% (419,784) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (3,232) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red wing vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Red wing.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red wing hold a high school diploma at 20.6% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chicago at 15.8%, compared to 9.7% in Red wing.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 19.4% in Red wing.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.