Demographics details for Red river, NM vs Sugar grove, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red river, NM vs Sugar grove, PA.
| Data | Red river | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 539 | 546 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $49,479 | $68,056 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Red river vs Sugar grove
- The population in Sugar grove is higher at 546, compared to 539 in Red river.
- Residents in Red river have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 42.2 years in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher median income of $68,056, compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Red river and Sugar grove at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Red river vs Sugar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red river | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 89 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red river vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 79% in Sugar grove.
- Both Red river and Sugar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Red river at 9% compared to 6% in Sugar grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar grove at 14%, compared to 2% in Red river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red river and Sugar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red river | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red river vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sugar grove at 23.5% versus 22.0% in Red river.
- Sugar grove has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Sugar grove has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Red river at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red river | Sugar grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 5.9% (32) | 28.2% (154) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (36) | 6.2% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (141) | 13.0% (71) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red river vs Sugar grove
- In Sugar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- In Sugar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- More residents in Red river have less than a high school education at 6.7% compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.