Demographics details for Red river, NM vs Little suamico, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Red river, NM vs Little suamico, WI.

Data Red river Little suamico
Population 539 4,878
Median Age 43.3 years 41.0 years
Median Income $49,479 $74,800
Married Families 27.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Red river vs Little suamico

  • The population in Little suamico is higher at 4,878, compared to 539 in Red river.
  • Residents in Red river have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 41.0 years in Little suamico.
  • Little suamico has a higher median income of $74,800, compared to $49,479 in Red river.
  • In Little suamico, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 27.0% in Red river.
  • Red river has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Little suamico.
  • The unemployment rate in Red river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Little suamico.

Demographics

Demographics Red river vs Little suamico provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Red river Little suamico
Black Data is updating 1
White 89 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 9 2
Two or More Races 2 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Red river vs Little suamico

  • In Little suamico, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Red river.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Little suamico at 95% compared to 89% in Red river.
  • In Little suamico, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Red river.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Red river at 9% compared to 2% in Little suamico.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Red river at 2% compared to 1% in Little suamico.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red river and Little suamico at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Red river Little suamico
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% Data is updating%
Depression 22.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.8% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 27.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 17.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Red river vs Little suamico

  • More residents in Red river report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Red river at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Red river at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Red river at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Red river at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Red river at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Red river Little suamico
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 5.9% (32) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 6.7% (36) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.2% (141) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Red river vs Little suamico

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Red river and Little suamico at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Red river hold a high school diploma at 5.9% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • More residents in Red river have less than a high school education at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Red river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 0.0% in Little suamico.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.