Demographics details for Red river, NM vs Laurel, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red river, NM vs Laurel, MS.
| Data | Red river | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 539 | 17,066 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $49,479 | $36,336 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Red river vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 17,066, compared to 539 in Red river.
- Residents in Red river have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 37.6 years in Laurel.
- Red river has a higher median income of $49,479 compared to $36,336 in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 20%, compared to 12% in Red river.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.2% in Red river.
Demographics
Demographics Red river vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red river | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 66 |
| White | 89 | 28 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Red river vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 28% in Laurel.
- Both Red river and Laurel have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Red river at 9% compared to 4% in Laurel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Red river at 2% compared to 1% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Red river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red river | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 11.6% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red river vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red river at 22.0% compared to 21.8% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red river at 17.1% compared to 11.6% in Laurel.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Red river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red river | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (124) |
| High School Diploma | 5.9% (32) | 17.3% (2,956) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (36) | 17.5% (2,979) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (141) | 14.6% (2,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red river vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.3% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 17.5%, compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 14.6% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.