Demographics details for Red river, NM vs Beacon, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red river, NM vs Beacon, IA.
| Data | Red river | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 539 | 430 |
| Median Age | 43.3 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $49,479 | $54,250 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Red river vs Beacon
- In Red river, the population is higher at 539, compared to 430 in Beacon.
- Residents in Red river have a higher median age of 43.3 years compared to 39.6 years in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher median income of $54,250, compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- In Beacon, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Beacon.
- The unemployment rate in Red river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Beacon.
Demographics
Demographics Red river vs Beacon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red river | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 89 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red river vs Beacon
- In Beacon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 88% in Beacon.
- In Beacon, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Red river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Red river at 9% compared to 0% in Beacon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beacon at 6%, compared to 2% in Red river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red river and Beacon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red river | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 18.4% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 27.1% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red river vs Beacon
- More residents in Red river report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.4% in Beacon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red river at 22.0% compared to 18.4% in Beacon.
- Beacon has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beacon at 21.4% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Beacon has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Red river at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Beacon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red river | Beacon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 5.9% (32) | 26.3% (113) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (36) | 18.4% (79) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.2% (141) | 6.0% (26) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red river vs Beacon
- In Beacon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- In Beacon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.3% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beacon at 18.4%, compared to 6.7% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 6.0% in Beacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.