Demographics details for Red lodge, MT vs Fishers, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red lodge, MT vs Fishers, IN.
| Data | Red lodge | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,510 | 101,966 |
| Median Age | 52.9 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,472 | $126,548 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Red lodge vs Fishers
- The population in Fishers is higher at 101,966, compared to 2,510 in Red lodge.
- Residents in Red lodge have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548, compared to $39,472 in Red lodge.
- In Fishers, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 39.0% in Red lodge.
- Red lodge has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Red lodge.
Demographics
Demographics Red lodge vs Fishers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red lodge | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 91 | 80 |
| Asian | 2 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red lodge vs Fishers
- In Fishers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Red lodge.
- Red lodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 80% in Fishers.
- In Fishers, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Red lodge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Red lodge at 4% compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fishers at 4%, compared to 2% in Red lodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red lodge and Fishers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red lodge | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.2% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 30.5% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red lodge vs Fishers
- More residents in Red lodge report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 12.5% in Fishers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red lodge at 22.8% compared to 22.2% in Fishers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Red lodge at 14.1% compared to 9.4% in Fishers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red lodge at 23.2% compared to 17.0% in Fishers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Red lodge at 30.5% compared to 27.8% in Fishers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Red lodge at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Fishers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red lodge | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.4% (418) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (423) | 6.5% (6,652) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (50) | 2.0% (2,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.4% (787) | 41.2% (42,051) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red lodge vs Fishers
- In Fishers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Red lodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red lodge hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 6.5% in Fishers.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 2.0%.
- In Fishers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 31.4% in Red lodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.