Demographics details for Red lodge, MT vs Columbus, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red lodge, MT vs Columbus, OH.
| Data | Red lodge | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,510 | 907,971 |
| Median Age | 52.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,472 | $62,994 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Red lodge vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 907,971, compared to 2,510 in Red lodge.
- Residents in Red lodge have a higher median age of 52.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $62,994, compared to $39,472 in Red lodge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Red lodge at 39.0% compared to 29.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 14%, compared to 10% in Red lodge.
- Columbus has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Red lodge.
Demographics
Demographics Red lodge vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Red lodge | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 29 |
| White | 91 | 51 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red lodge vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Red lodge.
- Red lodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 51% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Red lodge.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Red lodge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbus at 7%, compared to 2% in Red lodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red lodge and Columbus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Red lodge | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.2% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 30.5% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red lodge vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.8% in Red lodge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbus at 23.9% versus 22.8% in Red lodge.
- Columbus has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 14.1% in Red lodge.
- Binge drinking is more common in Red lodge at 23.2% compared to 17.7% in Columbus.
- Columbus has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 30.5% in Red lodge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Red lodge at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Red lodge | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 1.4% (12,592) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (423) | 14.4% (130,716) |
| Less than High School | 2.0% (50) | 9.7% (87,770) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.4% (787) | 25.2% (229,071) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red lodge vs Columbus
- In Columbus, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Red lodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red lodge hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Columbus.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbus at 9.7%, compared to 2.0% in Red lodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red lodge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.4% compared to 25.2% in Columbus.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.