Demographics details for Red bay, AL vs Siloam springs, AR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Red bay, AL vs Siloam springs, AR.

Data Red bay Siloam springs
Population 3,205 18,654
Median Age 46.3 years 30.1 years
Median Income $33,234 $59,911
Married Families 32.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Red bay vs Siloam springs

  • The population in Siloam springs is higher at 18,654, compared to 3,205 in Red bay.
  • Residents in Red bay have a higher median age of 46.3 years compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911, compared to $33,234 in Red bay.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Red bay.
  • The poverty level is higher in Siloam springs at 13%, compared to 10% in Red bay.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Red bay and Siloam springs at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Red bay vs Siloam springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Red bay Siloam springs
Black Data is updating 1
White 87 50
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 7 23
Two or More Races 6 20
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Red bay vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Red bay.
  • Red bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Red bay.
  • Siloam springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 7% in Red bay.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Siloam springs at 20%, compared to 6% in Red bay.
  • In Siloam springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Red bay.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Red bay Siloam springs
Mental Health Not Good 20.9% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 15.0%
Depression 26.5% 26.0%
Smoking 23.2% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 14.9%
Obesity 38.3% 39.2%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Red bay vs Siloam springs

  • More residents in Red bay report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 20.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Red bay at 26.5% compared to 26.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Red bay at 23.2% compared to 21.6% in Siloam springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Red bay at 15.2% compared to 14.9% in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 38.3% in Red bay.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Red bay at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Red bay Siloam springs
No Schooling 0.4% (14) 3.7% (681)
High School Diploma 29.0% (930) 13.5% (2,510)
Less than High School 27.0% (866) 17.4% (3,249)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (372) 14.4% (2,680)

Education Levels Comparison: Red bay vs Siloam springs

  • In Siloam springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.4% in Red bay.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Red bay hold a high school diploma at 29.0% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • More residents in Red bay have less than a high school education at 27.0% compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
  • In Siloam springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 11.6% in Red bay.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.