Demographics details for Red bay, AL vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Red bay, AL vs Averill park, NY.

Data Red bay Averill park
Population 3,205 1,608
Median Age 46.3 years 53.3 years
Median Income $33,234 $109,746
Married Families 32.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 10% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Red bay vs Averill park

  • In Red bay, the population is higher at 3,205, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 46.3 years in Red bay.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $33,234 in Red bay.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 32.0% in Red bay.
  • Red bay has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Red bay and Averill park at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Red bay vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Red bay Averill park
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 87 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Red bay vs Averill park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Red bay and Averill park at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 87% in Red bay.
  • Both Red bay and Averill park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Red bay at 7% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Red bay at 6% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Red bay and Averill park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Red bay Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 20.9% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.8% 9.1%
Depression 26.5% 23.7%
Smoking 23.2% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 21.5%
Obesity 38.3% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Red bay vs Averill park

  • More residents in Red bay report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Red bay at 26.5% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Red bay at 23.2% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.2% in Red bay.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Red bay at 38.3% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Red bay at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Red bay Averill park
No Schooling 0.4% (14) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 29.0% (930) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 27.0% (866) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.6% (372) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Red bay vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Red bay have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Red bay hold a high school diploma at 29.0% compared to 22.0% in Averill park.
  • More residents in Red bay have less than a high school education at 27.0% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 11.6% in Red bay.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.