Demographics details for Reading, PA vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Reading, PA vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Reading | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 94,858 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 31.1 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $42,852 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Reading vs Richland
- In Reading, the population is higher at 94,858, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in Richland is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Richland has a higher median income of $54,753, compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- In Richland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 12% in Richland.
- The unemployment rate in Reading is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Richland.
Demographics
Demographics Reading vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Reading | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 19 |
| White | 60 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 67 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Reading vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 11% in Reading.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Richland at 74% compared to 60% in Reading.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Reading.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Reading at 67% compared to 3% in Richland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Reading at 21% compared to 2% in Richland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Reading at 1% compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Reading | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 26.5% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 44.7% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Reading vs Richland
- More residents in Reading report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.9% in Richland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Richland at 23.4% versus 23.1% in Reading.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Reading at 26.5% compared to 19.3% in Richland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richland at 14.2% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Obesity rates are higher in Reading at 44.7% compared to 37.4% in Richland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Reading at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Reading | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (2,442) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (16,896) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 32.2% (30,522) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (6,512) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Reading vs Richland
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.7% in Richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- More residents in Reading have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In Richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.