Demographics details for Reading, PA vs Plymouth, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Reading, PA vs Plymouth, NC.
Data | Reading | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Population | 94,858 | 3,249 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $42,852 | $24,385 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Reading vs Plymouth
- In Reading, the population is higher at 94,858, compared to 3,249 in Plymouth.
- The median age in Plymouth is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Reading has a higher median income of $42,852 compared to $24,385 in Plymouth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Reading at 22.0% compared to 20.0% in Plymouth.
- The poverty level is identical in both Reading and Plymouth at 25%.
- The unemployment rate in Reading is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Plymouth.
Demographics
Demographics Reading vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Reading | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 68 |
White | 60 | 30 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 67 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 21 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Reading vs Plymouth
- In Plymouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 68% compared to 11% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 30% in Plymouth.
- Both Reading and Plymouth have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Reading at 67% compared to 1% in Plymouth.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Reading at 21% compared to 0% in Plymouth.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Reading at 1% compared to 0% in Plymouth.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Reading | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 13.5% |
Depression | 23.1% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 26.5% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 13.4% |
Obesity | 44.7% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Reading vs Plymouth
- More residents in Reading report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.5% in Plymouth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Reading at 23.1% compared to 22.0% in Plymouth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Reading at 26.5% compared to 21.5% in Plymouth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Plymouth at 13.4% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Obesity rates are higher in Reading at 44.7% compared to 44.3% in Plymouth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Plymouth at 30.0% compared to 20.0% in Reading.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Reading | Plymouth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (2,442) | 2.2% (70) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (16,896) | 20.1% (652) |
Less than High School | 32.2% (30,522) | 16.9% (550) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (6,512) | 3.9% (127) |
Education Levels Comparison: Reading vs Plymouth
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.2% in Plymouth.
- In Plymouth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.1% compared to 17.8% in Reading.
- More residents in Reading have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 16.9% in Plymouth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 3.9% in Plymouth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.