Demographics details for Reading, PA vs New iberia, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Reading, PA vs New iberia, LA.
Data | Reading | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Population | 94,858 | 27,473 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $42,852 | $47,108 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Reading vs New iberia
- In Reading, the population is higher at 94,858, compared to 27,473 in New iberia.
- The median age in New iberia is higher at 34.9 years, compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- New iberia has a higher median income of $47,108, compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- In New iberia, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 20% in New iberia.
- New iberia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.2% in Reading.
Demographics
Demographics Reading vs New iberia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Reading | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 46 |
White | 60 | 42 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 67 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Reading vs New iberia
- In New iberia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 11% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 42% in New iberia.
- In New iberia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Reading.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Reading at 67% compared to 4% in New iberia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Reading at 21% compared to 6% in New iberia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Reading at 1% compared to 0% in New iberia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Reading | New iberia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 21.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 15.7% |
Depression | 23.1% | 27.0% |
Smoking | 26.5% | 26.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 44.7% | 45.6% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Reading vs New iberia
- In New iberia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.7% in Reading.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New iberia at 27.0% versus 23.1% in Reading.
- New iberia has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 26.5% in Reading.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in New iberia at 15.6% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- New iberia has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 44.7% in Reading.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Reading and New iberia at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Reading | New iberia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (2,442) | 1.3% (345) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (16,896) | 21.7% (5,975) |
Less than High School | 32.2% (30,522) | 18.7% (5,143) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (6,512) | 10.7% (2,944) |
Education Levels Comparison: Reading vs New iberia
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.3% in New iberia.
- In New iberia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 17.8% in Reading.
- More residents in Reading have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 18.7% in New iberia.
- In New iberia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.