Demographics details for Reading, PA vs Garland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Reading, PA vs Garland, TX.
Data | Reading | Garland |
---|---|---|
Population | 94,858 | 240,854 |
Median Age | 31.1 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $42,852 | $71,044 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Reading vs Garland
- The population in Garland is higher at 240,854, compared to 94,858 in Reading.
- The median age in Garland is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 31.1 years in Reading.
- Garland has a higher median income of $71,044, compared to $42,852 in Reading.
- In Garland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 22.0% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 12% in Garland.
- The unemployment rate in Reading is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.0% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Reading vs Garland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Reading | Garland |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 16 |
White | 60 | 6 |
Asian | 1 | 11 |
Hispanic | 67 | 45 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 21 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Reading vs Garland
- In Garland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 11% in Reading.
- Reading has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 6% in Garland.
- In Garland, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Reading.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Reading at 67% compared to 45% in Garland.
- Both Reading and Garland have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 21%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Reading and Garland at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Reading | Garland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 12.1% |
Depression | 23.1% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 26.5% | 17.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 44.7% | 33.9% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Reading vs Garland
- More residents in Reading report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Garland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Reading at 23.1% compared to 22.2% in Garland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Reading at 26.5% compared to 17.2% in Garland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garland at 17.6% compared to 13.0% in Reading.
- Obesity rates are higher in Reading at 44.7% compared to 33.9% in Garland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Reading at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Reading | Garland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.6% (2,442) | 2.5% (6,080) |
High School Diploma | 17.8% (16,896) | 13.9% (33,524) |
Less than High School | 32.2% (30,522) | 24.7% (59,406) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (6,512) | 15.5% (37,249) |
Education Levels Comparison: Reading vs Garland
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.5% in Garland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Reading hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 13.9% in Garland.
- More residents in Reading have less than a high school education at 32.2% compared to 24.7% in Garland.
- In Garland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 6.9% in Reading.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.