Demographics details for Rawlins, WY vs Livingston, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rawlins, WY vs Livingston, AL.
| Data | Rawlins | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,197 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 21.2 years |
| Median Income | $70,054 | $20,417 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rawlins vs Livingston
- In Rawlins, the population is higher at 8,197, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- Residents in Rawlins have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Rawlins has a higher median income of $70,054 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rawlins at 38.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 11% in Rawlins.
- Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Rawlins.
Demographics
Demographics Rawlins vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rawlins | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 58 |
| White | 63 | 38 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rawlins vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 2% in Rawlins.
- Rawlins has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- Both Rawlins and Livingston have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rawlins at 26% compared to 1% in Livingston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rawlins at 6% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rawlins at 2% compared to 0% in Livingston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rawlins | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 12.3% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rawlins vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.3% in Rawlins.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Livingston at 22.0% versus 19.3% in Rawlins.
- Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 18.4% in Rawlins.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rawlins at 17.3% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 35.9% in Rawlins.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Rawlins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rawlins | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (101) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,779) | 7.7% (248) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,137) | 2.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (863) | 15.5% (496) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rawlins vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Rawlins have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rawlins hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Rawlins have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- In Livingston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 10.5% in Rawlins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.