Demographics details for Rawlins, WY vs Livermore, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rawlins, WY vs Livermore, CA.
| Data | Rawlins | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,197 | 84,701 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $70,054 | $152,590 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Rawlins vs Livermore
- The population in Livermore is higher at 84,701, compared to 8,197 in Rawlins.
- The median age in Livermore is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.6 years in Rawlins.
- Livermore has a higher median income of $152,590, compared to $70,054 in Rawlins.
- In Livermore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Rawlins.
- Rawlins has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Livermore.
- Livermore has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Rawlins.
Demographics
Demographics Rawlins vs Livermore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rawlins | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 63 | 44 |
| Asian | 1 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 26 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rawlins vs Livermore
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Rawlins and Livermore at 2%.
- Rawlins has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 44% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Rawlins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rawlins at 26% compared to 23% in Livermore.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Livermore at 13%, compared to 6% in Rawlins.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rawlins at 2% compared to 1% in Livermore.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rawlins | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 19.3% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 18.4% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 26.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rawlins vs Livermore
- More residents in Rawlins report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Livermore.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Livermore at 19.6% versus 19.3% in Rawlins.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rawlins at 18.4% compared to 9.4% in Livermore.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Livermore at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Rawlins.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rawlins at 35.9% compared to 26.6% in Livermore.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rawlins at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Livermore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rawlins | Livermore |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (101) | 1.4% (1,173) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,779) | 9.5% (8,051) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,137) | 7.8% (6,576) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (863) | 35.4% (30,013) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rawlins vs Livermore
- In Livermore, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.2% in Rawlins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rawlins hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 9.5% in Livermore.
- More residents in Rawlins have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 7.8% in Livermore.
- In Livermore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 10.5% in Rawlins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.