Demographics details for Raven, VA vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Raven, VA vs Farmington, WV.
| Data | Raven | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,065 | 397 |
| Median Age | 46.2 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $36,613 | $54,750 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Raven vs Farmington
- In Raven, the population is higher at 2,065, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- Residents in Raven have a higher median age of 46.2 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $54,750, compared to $36,613 in Raven.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Raven.
- Raven has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Raven.
Demographics
Demographics Raven vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Raven | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 99 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Raven vs Farmington
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Raven and Farmington at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 99% in Raven.
- Both Raven and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Raven and Farmington at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Raven at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Raven and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Raven | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.5% | 20.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 30.4% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 27.3% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Raven vs Farmington
- More residents in Raven report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 20.6% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Raven at 30.4% compared to 28.3% in Farmington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Raven at 27.3% compared to 24.2% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Raven at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Raven at 40.3% compared to 39.5% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Raven at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Raven | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (11) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (388) | 31.5% (125) |
| Less than High School | 22.5% (464) | 8.1% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (208) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Raven vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Raven have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 18.8% in Raven.
- More residents in Raven have less than a high school education at 22.5% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.