Demographics details for Raton, NM vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Raton, NM vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Raton Thompsons station
Population 5,974 8,199
Median Age 44.4 years 36.1 years
Median Income $40,899 $116,569
Married Families 30.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 16% 3%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 2.6

Population Comparison: Raton vs Thompsons station

  • The population in Thompsons station is higher at 8,199, compared to 5,974 in Raton.
  • Residents in Raton have a higher median age of 44.4 years compared to 36.1 years in Thompsons station.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569, compared to $40,899 in Raton.
  • In Thompsons station, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 30.0% in Raton.
  • Raton has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Raton is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.6% in Thompsons station.

Demographics

Demographics Raton vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Raton Thompsons station
Black Data is updating 2
White 25 84
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 56 1
Two or More Races 16 11
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Raton vs Thompsons station

  • In Thompsons station, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Raton.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 25% in Raton.
  • In Thompsons station, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Raton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Raton at 56% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Raton at 16% compared to 11% in Thompsons station.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Raton at 2% compared to 0% in Thompsons station.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Raton Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 9.3%
Depression 22.3% 24.3%
Smoking 17.3% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 17.0%
Obesity 39.0% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Raton vs Thompsons station

  • More residents in Raton report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.1% in Thompsons station.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Thompsons station at 24.3% versus 22.3% in Raton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Raton at 17.3% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Thompsons station at 17.0% compared to 14.6% in Raton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Raton at 39.0% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Raton at 26.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Raton Thompsons station
No Schooling 0.3% (18) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 24.6% (1,468) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 14.1% (844) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.4% (683) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Raton vs Thompsons station

  • In Thompsons station, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Raton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Raton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Raton have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 11.4% in Raton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.