Demographics details for Raritan, NJ vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Raritan, NJ vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Raritan | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,123 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $99,928 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Raritan vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 9,123 in Raritan.
- Residents in Raritan have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Raritan has a higher median income of $99,928 compared to $83,123 in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Raritan at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- The poverty level is higher in Cranston at 8%, compared to 4% in Raritan.
- The unemployment rate in Raritan is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Cranston.
Demographics
Demographics Raritan vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Raritan | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 49 | 61 |
| Asian | 15 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Raritan vs Cranston
- In Cranston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Raritan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cranston at 61% compared to 49% in Raritan.
- The Asian population is larger in Raritan at 15% compared to 7% in Cranston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Raritan at 19% compared to 18% in Cranston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Raritan at 13% compared to 9% in Cranston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Raritan and Cranston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Raritan | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 26.8% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Raritan vs Cranston
- In Cranston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.2% in Raritan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cranston at 24.9% versus 18.9% in Raritan.
- Cranston has a higher smoking rate at 13.5% compared to 13.1% in Raritan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 16.8% in Raritan.
- Cranston has higher obesity rates at 29.8% compared to 26.8% in Raritan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Raritan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Raritan | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (117) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (1,484) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (1,163) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (2,294) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Raritan vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of residents in Raritan have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raritan hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cranston at 13.4%, compared to 12.7% in Raritan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raritan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.1% compared to 24.7% in Cranston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.