Demographics details for Raritan, NJ vs Columbia, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Raritan, NJ vs Columbia, MO.
Data | Raritan | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,123 | 128,555 |
Median Age | 43.2 years | 28.8 years |
Median Income | $99,928 | $60,455 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Raritan vs Columbia
- The population in Columbia is higher at 128,555, compared to 9,123 in Raritan.
- Residents in Raritan have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 28.8 years in Columbia.
- Raritan has a higher median income of $99,928 compared to $60,455 in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Raritan at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Columbia.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbia at 19%, compared to 4% in Raritan.
- The unemployment rate in Raritan is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.8% in Columbia.
Demographics
Demographics Raritan vs Columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Raritan | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 11 |
White | 49 | 73 |
Asian | 15 | 6 |
Hispanic | 19 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Raritan vs Columbia
- In Columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 4% in Raritan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbia at 73% compared to 49% in Raritan.
- The Asian population is larger in Raritan at 15% compared to 6% in Columbia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Raritan at 19% compared to 4% in Columbia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Raritan at 13% compared to 6% in Columbia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Raritan and Columbia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Raritan | Columbia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.4% |
Depression | 18.9% | 25.3% |
Smoking | 13.1% | 16.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 26.8% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Raritan vs Columbia
- In Columbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.2% in Raritan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Columbia at 25.3% versus 18.9% in Raritan.
- Columbia has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 13.1% in Raritan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbia at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Raritan.
- Columbia has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 26.8% in Raritan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Raritan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Raritan | Columbia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (117) | 0.7% (845) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (1,484) | 7.8% (9,965) |
Less than High School | 12.7% (1,163) | 4.2% (5,383) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.1% (2,294) | 30.5% (39,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Raritan vs Columbia
- A higher percentage of residents in Raritan have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Columbia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raritan hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 7.8% in Columbia.
- More residents in Raritan have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 4.2% in Columbia.
- In Columbia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 25.1% in Raritan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.