Demographics details for Randolph, AL vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Randolph, AL vs Fort washington, MD.

Data Randolph Fort washington
Population 22,479 25,825
Median Age 44.1 years 44.1 years
Median Income $49,879 $143,623
Married Families 43.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Randolph vs Fort washington

  • The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 22,479 in Randolph.
  • The median age is the same in both Randolph and Fort washington at 44.1 years.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $49,879 in Randolph.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Randolph and Fort washington at 43.0%.
  • Randolph has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Randolph.

Demographics

Demographics Randolph vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Randolph Fort washington
Black 19 61
White 75 8
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic 3 17
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Randolph vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 19% in Randolph.
  • Randolph has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Randolph.
  • Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Randolph.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort washington at 6%, compared to 3% in Randolph.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Randolph and Fort washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Randolph Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.4% 7.9%
Depression 24.3% 11.6%
Smoking 20.3% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 12.0%
Obesity 40.1% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Randolph vs Fort washington

  • More residents in Randolph report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Randolph at 24.3% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Randolph at 20.3% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Randolph at 14.9% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Randolph at 40.1% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Randolph at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Randolph Fort washington
No Schooling 1.2% (274) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 19.0% (4,282) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 21.0% (4,731) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.1% (2,936) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: Randolph vs Fort washington

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Randolph and Fort washington at 1.2%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Randolph hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • More residents in Randolph have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 13.1% in Randolph.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.