Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Warrensburg, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Warrensburg, MO.
Data | Randleman | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,642 | 19,458 |
Median Age | 33.5 years | 24.4 years |
Median Income | $63,040 | $54,535 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Randleman vs Warrensburg
- The population in Warrensburg is higher at 19,458, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- Residents in Randleman have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 24.4 years in Warrensburg.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $54,535 in Warrensburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Warrensburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Warrensburg at 14%, compared to 10% in Randleman.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Randleman and Warrensburg at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Randleman vs Warrensburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Randleman | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 4 |
White | 77 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 9 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Warrensburg
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Randleman and Warrensburg at 4%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warrensburg at 80% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- In Warrensburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Randleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Randleman at 9% compared to 6% in Warrensburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Randleman at 8% compared to 7% in Warrensburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Warrensburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Randleman | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.7% |
Depression | 25.7% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Warrensburg
- In Warrensburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Randleman at 25.7% compared to 24.3% in Warrensburg.
- Warrensburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Warrensburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Randleman at 37.5% compared to 37.2% in Warrensburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Warrensburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Randleman | Warrensburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.8% (150) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (768) | 9.7% (1,895) |
Less than High School | 22.1% (1,026) | 6.0% (1,174) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (320) | 18.4% (3,573) |
Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Warrensburg
- In Warrensburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Randleman hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 9.7% in Warrensburg.
- More residents in Randleman have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 6.0% in Warrensburg.
- In Warrensburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.