Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Trinity, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Trinity, TX.
| Data | Randleman | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,642 | 13,996 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 50.1 years |
| Median Income | $63,040 | $51,165 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Randleman vs Trinity
- The population in Trinity is higher at 13,996, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
- The median age in Trinity is higher at 50.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $51,165 in Trinity.
- In Trinity, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 38.0% in Randleman.
- The poverty level is higher in Trinity at 17%, compared to 10% in Randleman.
- Trinity has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Randleman.
Demographics
Demographics Randleman vs Trinity provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Randleman | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 8 |
| White | 77 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Trinity
- In Trinity, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 4% in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 76% in Trinity.
- Both Randleman and Trinity have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Trinity has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 9% in Randleman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Randleman at 8% compared to 5% in Trinity.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Trinity.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Randleman | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Trinity
- In Trinity, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trinity at 26.4% versus 25.7% in Randleman.
- Trinity has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trinity at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Randleman.
- Trinity has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trinity at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Randleman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Randleman | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.5% (70) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (768) | 22.2% (3,102) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (1,026) | 18.1% (2,540) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (320) | 10.6% (1,481) |
Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Trinity
- In Trinity, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- In Trinity, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
- More residents in Randleman have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 18.1% in Trinity.
- In Trinity, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.