Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Thornton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Thornton, CA.
| Data | Randleman | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,642 | 873 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 29.6 years |
| Median Income | $63,040 | $43,839 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Randleman vs Thornton
- In Randleman, the population is higher at 4,642, compared to 873 in Thornton.
- Residents in Randleman have a higher median age of 33.5 years compared to 29.6 years in Thornton.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $43,839 in Thornton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Thornton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Randleman and Thornton at 10%.
- Thornton has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Randleman.
Demographics
Demographics Randleman vs Thornton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Randleman | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 77 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 59 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 24 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Thornton
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Randleman and Thornton at 4%.
- Randleman has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 6% in Thornton.
- In Thornton, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Randleman.
- Thornton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 9% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thornton at 24%, compared to 8% in Randleman.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Thornton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Randleman | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 39.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Randleman at 25.7% compared to 19.0% in Thornton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Randleman at 19.4% compared to 17.6% in Thornton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 14.0% in Thornton.
- Thornton has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Thornton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Randleman | Thornton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 4.5% (39) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (768) | 19.4% (169) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (1,026) | 42.4% (370) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (320) | 2.5% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Thornton
- In Thornton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- In Thornton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Thornton at 42.4%, compared to 22.1% in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Randleman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 2.5% in Thornton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.