Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Onalaska, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Onalaska, TX.
| Data | Randleman | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,642 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $63,040 | $56,168 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Randleman vs Onalaska
- In Randleman, the population is higher at 4,642, compared to 3,205 in Onalaska.
- The median age in Onalaska is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $56,168 in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Onalaska.
- The poverty level is higher in Onalaska at 12%, compared to 10% in Randleman.
- Onalaska has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Randleman.
Demographics
Demographics Randleman vs Onalaska provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Randleman | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 77 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Onalaska
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Randleman at 4% compared to 1% in Onalaska.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Onalaska at 91% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- Both Randleman and Onalaska have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Randleman at 9% compared to 3% in Onalaska.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Randleman at 8% compared to 5% in Onalaska.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Onalaska.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Randleman | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Onalaska at 26.0% versus 25.7% in Randleman.
- Onalaska has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Onalaska at 19.4% compared to 17.7% in Randleman.
- Onalaska has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Onalaska at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Randleman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Randleman | Onalaska |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 0.7% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (768) | 15.3% (491) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (1,026) | 21.5% (689) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (320) | 5.0% (161) |
Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Onalaska
- In Onalaska, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Randleman hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 15.3% in Onalaska.
- More residents in Randleman have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 21.5% in Onalaska.
- A higher percentage of residents in Randleman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 5.0% in Onalaska.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.