Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Oakland park, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Oakland park, FL.

Data Randleman Oakland park
Population 4,642 43,824
Median Age 33.5 years 39.1 years
Median Income $63,040 $64,989
Married Families 38.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 10% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Randleman vs Oakland park

  • The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 4,642 in Randleman.
  • The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
  • Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $63,040 in Randleman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Oakland park at 14%, compared to 10% in Randleman.
  • The unemployment rate in Randleman is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.

Demographics

Demographics Randleman vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Randleman Oakland park
Black 4 29
White 77 20
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 9 32
Two or More Races 8 17
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 4% in Randleman.
  • Randleman has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • In Oakland park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Randleman.
  • Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 9% in Randleman.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 8% in Randleman.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Oakland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Randleman Oakland park
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 12.2%
Depression 25.7% 17.8%
Smoking 19.4% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 15.0%
Obesity 37.5% 31.1%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Oakland park

  • More residents in Randleman report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Randleman at 25.7% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Randleman at 37.5% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Randleman Oakland park
No Schooling 0.3% (16) 1.4% (596)
High School Diploma 16.5% (768) 19.8% (8,695)
Less than High School 22.1% (1,026) 16.2% (7,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.9% (320) 20.7% (9,073)

Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
  • In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
  • More residents in Randleman have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 16.2% in Oakland park.
  • In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.