Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Mitchell, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Mitchell, IN.
| Data | Randleman | Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,642 | 3,940 |
| Median Age | 33.5 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,040 | $51,025 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Randleman vs Mitchell
- In Randleman, the population is higher at 4,642, compared to 3,940 in Mitchell.
- The median age in Mitchell is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
- Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $51,025 in Mitchell.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Mitchell.
- The poverty level is identical in both Randleman and Mitchell at 10%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Randleman and Mitchell at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Randleman vs Mitchell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Randleman | Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 77 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Mitchell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Randleman at 4% compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mitchell at 92% compared to 77% in Randleman.
- In Mitchell, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Randleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Randleman at 9% compared to 1% in Mitchell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Randleman at 8% compared to 2% in Mitchell.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Mitchell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Randleman | Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 24.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Mitchell
- In Mitchell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mitchell at 28.5% versus 25.7% in Randleman.
- Mitchell has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 15.9% in Mitchell.
- Mitchell has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Randleman and Mitchell at 21.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Randleman | Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (16) | 1.6% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (768) | 20.4% (802) |
| Less than High School | 22.1% (1,026) | 29.2% (1,152) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (320) | 9.8% (387) |
Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Mitchell
- In Mitchell, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
- In Mitchell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mitchell at 29.2%, compared to 22.1% in Randleman.
- In Mitchell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 6.9% in Randleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.