Demographics details for Randleman, NC vs Cedar grove, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Randleman, NC vs Cedar grove, WV.

Data Randleman Cedar grove
Population 4,642 693
Median Age 33.5 years 44.3 years
Median Income $63,040 $55,600
Married Families 38.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Randleman vs Cedar grove

  • In Randleman, the population is higher at 4,642, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 33.5 years in Randleman.
  • Randleman has a higher median income of $63,040 compared to $55,600 in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Randleman at 38.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cedar grove at 12%, compared to 10% in Randleman.
  • Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Randleman.

Demographics

Demographics Randleman vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Randleman Cedar grove
Black 4 Data is updating
White 77 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 9 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 2
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Randleman vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Randleman at 4% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 77% in Randleman.
  • Both Randleman and Cedar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Randleman at 9% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Randleman at 8% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Randleman at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Randleman Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 17.6% 22.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 15.7%
Depression 25.7% 30.1%
Smoking 19.4% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 13.9%
Obesity 37.5% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Randleman vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 17.6% in Randleman.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 25.7% in Randleman.
  • Cedar grove has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 19.4% in Randleman.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Randleman at 17.7% compared to 13.9% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 37.5% in Randleman.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Randleman at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Cedar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Randleman Cedar grove
No Schooling 0.3% (16) 0.6% (4)
High School Diploma 16.5% (768) 21.2% (147)
Less than High School 22.1% (1,026) 18.5% (128)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.9% (320) 2.3% (16)

Education Levels Comparison: Randleman vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Randleman.
  • In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 16.5% in Randleman.
  • More residents in Randleman have less than a high school education at 22.1% compared to 18.5% in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Randleman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.9% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.