Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Watertown, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Watertown, SD.

Data Rancho cucamonga Watertown
Population 176,336 23,019
Median Age 37.5 years 38.9 years
Median Income $105,534 $61,320
Married Families 42.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 11% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Watertown

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 23,019 in Watertown.
  • The median age in Watertown is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $61,320 in Watertown.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 40.0% in Watertown.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Watertown.
  • The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Watertown.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Watertown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Watertown
Black 9 1
White 22 87
Asian 14 1
Hispanic 39 4
Two or More Races 15 4
American Indian 1 3

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Watertown

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rancho cucamonga at 9% compared to 1% in Watertown.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Watertown at 87% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 1% in Watertown.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 4% in Watertown.
  • In Watertown, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Rancho cucamonga.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Watertown
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 13.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 9.4%
Depression 17.2% 20.1%
Smoking 10.0% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 20.1%
Obesity 33.9% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Watertown

  • More residents in Rancho cucamonga report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 13.4% in Watertown.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Watertown at 20.1% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Watertown has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Watertown at 20.1% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Watertown has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Watertown at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Watertown
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 1.6% (364)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 23.1% (5,313)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 11.9% (2,738)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 13.7% (3,162)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Watertown

  • In Watertown, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Watertown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Watertown at 11.9%, compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 13.7% in Watertown.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.