Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Piffard, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Piffard, NY.

Data Rancho cucamonga Piffard
Population 176,336 248
Median Age 37.5 years 69.3 years
Median Income $105,534 $49,052
Married Families 42.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 11% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.2

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Piffard

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 248 in Piffard.
  • The median age in Piffard is higher at 69.3 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $49,052 in Piffard.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Piffard.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Piffard.
  • The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.2% in Piffard.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Piffard provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Piffard
Black 9 Data is updating
White 22 100
Asian 14 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 Data is updating
Two or More Races 15 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Piffard

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rancho cucamonga at 9% compared to 0% in Piffard.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Piffard at 100% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 0% in Piffard.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 0% in Piffard.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 0% in Piffard.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Piffard.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Piffard
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 13.2%
Depression 17.2% 27.4%
Smoking 10.0% 25.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.0%
Obesity 33.9% 43.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Piffard

  • In Piffard, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Piffard at 27.4% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Piffard has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Piffard at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Piffard has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piffard at 33.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Piffard
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 12.5% (31)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 21.0% (52)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 25.0% (62)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 14.1% (35)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Piffard

  • In Piffard, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 12.5% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Piffard, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Piffard at 25.0%, compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 14.1% in Piffard.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.