Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Lancaster, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Lancaster, PA.

Data Rancho cucamonga Lancaster
Population 176,336 57,453
Median Age 37.5 years 31.8 years
Median Income $105,534 $61,014
Married Families 42.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.9

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Lancaster

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 57,453 in Lancaster.
  • Residents in Rancho cucamonga have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 31.8 years in Lancaster.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $61,014 in Lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 28.0% in Lancaster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 11% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.8% in Rancho cucamonga.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Lancaster
Black 9 18
White 22 24
Asian 14 3
Hispanic 39 40
Two or More Races 15 15
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 24% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 39% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Both Rancho cucamonga and Lancaster have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 15%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Lancaster.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Lancaster
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 14.4%
Depression 17.2% 21.8%
Smoking 10.0% 20.4%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.9%
Obesity 33.9% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 21.8% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Lancaster.
  • Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Lancaster
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 1.9% (1,077)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 16.7% (9,588)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 18.6% (10,712)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 17.4% (10,012)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Lancaster

  • In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 18.6%, compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 17.4% in Lancaster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.