Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Daphne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Daphne, AL.
| Data | Rancho cucamonga | Daphne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,336 | 29,670 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $105,534 | $80,657 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Daphne
- In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 29,670 in Daphne.
- The median age in Daphne is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $80,657 in Daphne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Daphne.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Daphne.
- The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.7% in Daphne.
Demographics
Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Daphne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rancho cucamonga | Daphne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 14 |
| White | 22 | 74 |
| Asian | 14 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Daphne
- In Daphne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 9% in Rancho cucamonga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Daphne at 74% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
- The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 3% in Daphne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 4% in Daphne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 5% in Daphne.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Daphne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rancho cucamonga | Daphne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 14.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Daphne
- In Daphne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Daphne at 22.8% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Daphne has a higher smoking rate at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Daphne at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Daphne has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rancho cucamonga and Daphne at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rancho cucamonga | Daphne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,052) | 0.1% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (20,590) | 11.4% (3,374) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (17,566) | 5.4% (1,610) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (44,534) | 25.3% (7,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Daphne
- A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Daphne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a high school diploma at 11.7% compared to 11.4% in Daphne.
- More residents in Rancho cucamonga have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 5.4% in Daphne.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Rancho cucamonga and Daphne at 25.3%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.