Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Chandler, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Chandler, AZ.
| Data | Rancho cucamonga | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,336 | 280,711 |
| Median Age | 37.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $105,534 | $99,374 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Chandler
- The population in Chandler is higher at 280,711, compared to 176,336 in Rancho cucamonga.
- Residents in Rancho cucamonga have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Chandler.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $99,374 in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Chandler.
- Rancho cucamonga has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.0% in Chandler.
Demographics
Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rancho cucamonga | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 6 |
| White | 22 | 48 |
| Asian | 14 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rancho cucamonga at 9% compared to 6% in Chandler.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chandler at 48% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
- The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 12% in Chandler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 21% in Chandler.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 11% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Rancho cucamonga.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rancho cucamonga | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 17.2% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 10.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 27.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Chandler
- In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 18.5% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 18.2% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rancho cucamonga at 33.9% compared to 27.9% in Chandler.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rancho cucamonga and Chandler at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rancho cucamonga | Chandler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,052) | 0.8% (2,196) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (20,590) | 10.1% (28,272) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (17,566) | 6.8% (18,988) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (44,534) | 31.0% (86,947) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Chandler
- A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Chandler.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a high school diploma at 11.7% compared to 10.1% in Chandler.
- More residents in Rancho cucamonga have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 6.8% in Chandler.
- In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 25.3% in Rancho cucamonga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.