Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Blakely, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Blakely, GA.

Data Rancho cucamonga Blakely
Population 176,336 5,238
Median Age 37.5 years 31.5 years
Median Income $105,534 $43,008
Married Families 42.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 11% 26%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.7

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Blakely

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 5,238 in Blakely.
  • Residents in Rancho cucamonga have a higher median age of 37.5 years compared to 31.5 years in Blakely.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $43,008 in Blakely.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 27.0% in Blakely.
  • The poverty level is higher in Blakely at 26%, compared to 11% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.7% in Blakely.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Blakely provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Blakely
Black 9 77
White 22 22
Asian 14 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 Data is updating
Two or More Races 15 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Blakely

  • In Blakely, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 77% compared to 9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Rancho cucamonga and Blakely at 22%.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 0% in Blakely.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 0% in Blakely.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 1% in Blakely.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Blakely.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Blakely
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 15.6%
Depression 17.2% 21.3%
Smoking 10.0% 23.4%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 12.4%
Obesity 33.9% 44.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Blakely

  • In Blakely, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Blakely at 21.3% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Blakely has a higher smoking rate at 23.4% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 12.4% in Blakely.
  • Blakely has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Blakely at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Blakely
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 0.7% (35)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 18.8% (985)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 14.5% (759)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 6.1% (320)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Blakely

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Blakely.
  • In Blakely, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Blakely at 14.5%, compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 6.1% in Blakely.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.