Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Bernice, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Bernice, LA.

Data Rancho cucamonga Bernice
Population 176,336 1,319
Median Age 37.5 years 40.5 years
Median Income $105,534 $24,375
Married Families 42.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 11% 21%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 5.2

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bernice

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 1,319 in Bernice.
  • The median age in Bernice is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $24,375 in Bernice.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rancho cucamonga at 42.0% compared to 23.0% in Bernice.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bernice at 21%, compared to 11% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Bernice has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.8% in Rancho cucamonga.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Bernice provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Bernice
Black 9 62
White 22 22
Asian 14 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 16
Two or More Races 15 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bernice

  • In Bernice, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Rancho cucamonga and Bernice at 22%.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 0% in Bernice.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 16% in Bernice.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 0% in Bernice.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Bernice.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Bernice
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 14.2%
Depression 17.2% 22.7%
Smoking 10.0% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 15.6%
Obesity 33.9% 45.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bernice

  • In Bernice, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bernice at 22.7% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Bernice has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rancho cucamonga at 16.6% compared to 15.6% in Bernice.
  • Bernice has higher obesity rates at 45.8% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bernice at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Bernice
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 1.9% (25)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 35.4% (467)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 13.6% (179)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 6.4% (84)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bernice

  • In Bernice, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • In Bernice, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.4% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bernice at 13.6%, compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 6.4% in Bernice.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.