Demographics details for Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Bellville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rancho cucamonga, CA vs Bellville, OH.

Data Rancho cucamonga Bellville
Population 176,336 1,982
Median Age 37.5 years 38.3 years
Median Income $105,534 $54,259
Married Families 42.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 11% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bellville

  • In Rancho cucamonga, the population is higher at 176,336, compared to 1,982 in Bellville.
  • The median age in Bellville is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher median income of $105,534 compared to $54,259 in Bellville.
  • In Bellville, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 42.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Rancho cucamonga has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Bellville.
  • The unemployment rate in Rancho cucamonga is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Bellville.

Demographics

Demographics Rancho cucamonga vs Bellville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rancho cucamonga Bellville
Black 9 2
White 22 96
Asian 14 1
Hispanic 39 Data is updating
Two or More Races 15 1
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bellville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rancho cucamonga at 9% compared to 2% in Bellville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bellville at 96% compared to 22% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 14% compared to 1% in Bellville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rancho cucamonga at 39% compared to 0% in Bellville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Rancho cucamonga at 15% compared to 1% in Bellville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rancho cucamonga at 1% compared to 0% in Bellville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rancho cucamonga Bellville
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 11.5%
Depression 17.2% 25.2%
Smoking 10.0% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 19.2%
Obesity 33.9% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bellville

  • In Bellville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.8% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bellville at 25.2% versus 17.2% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Bellville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 10.0% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellville at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • Bellville has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 33.9% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bellville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Rancho cucamonga.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rancho cucamonga Bellville
No Schooling 1.2% (2,052) 0.6% (11)
High School Diploma 11.7% (20,590) 24.4% (483)
Less than High School 10.0% (17,566) 9.5% (188)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.3% (44,534) 16.7% (331)

Education Levels Comparison: Rancho cucamonga vs Bellville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Bellville.
  • In Bellville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 11.7% in Rancho cucamonga.
  • More residents in Rancho cucamonga have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 9.5% in Bellville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rancho cucamonga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 16.7% in Bellville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.