Demographics details for Raeford, NC vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Raeford, NC vs Shafter, CA.
Data | Raeford | Shafter |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,529 | 21,282 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $38,371 | $66,418 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Raeford vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 4,529 in Raeford.
- Residents in Raeford have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418, compared to $38,371 in Raeford.
- In Shafter, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 27.0% in Raeford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Raeford and Shafter at 20%.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Raeford.
Demographics
Demographics Raeford vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Raeford | Shafter |
---|---|---|
Black | 46 | 2 |
White | 30 | -9 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 8 | 78 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 27 |
American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Raeford vs Shafter
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Raeford at 46% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- Raeford has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Raeford.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 8% in Raeford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 10% in Raeford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Raeford at 6% compared to 1% in Shafter.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Raeford | Shafter |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.6% |
Depression | 23.7% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 22.1% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Raeford vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Raeford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Raeford at 23.7% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Raeford at 22.1% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shafter at 14.9% compared to 14.7% in Raeford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Raeford at 41.7% compared to 39.4% in Shafter.
- Disability percentages are higher in Raeford at 26.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Raeford | Shafter |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (46) | 2.7% (567) |
High School Diploma | 19.1% (866) | 14.1% (2,992) |
Less than High School | 17.0% (768) | 32.9% (6,999) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (599) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Raeford vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Raeford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raeford hold a high school diploma at 19.1% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 17.0% in Raeford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Raeford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.