Demographics details for Radford, VA vs Sulphur springs, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Radford, VA vs Sulphur springs, TX.

Data Radford Sulphur springs
Population 16,738 16,408
Median Age 23.3 years 39.4 years
Median Income $51,039 $54,950
Married Families 23.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 18% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.6 4.5

Population Comparison: Radford vs Sulphur springs

  • In Radford, the population is higher at 16,738, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
  • The median age in Sulphur springs is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 23.3 years in Radford.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher median income of $54,950, compared to $51,039 in Radford.
  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 23.0% in Radford.
  • Radford has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Sulphur springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Radford is higher at 4.6%, compared to 4.5% in Sulphur springs.

Demographics

Demographics Radford vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Radford Sulphur springs
Black 9 14
White 82 63
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 3 17
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Radford vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 9% in Radford.
  • Radford has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Radford at 2% compared to 1% in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Radford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur springs at 5%, compared to 4% in Radford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Radford and Sulphur springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Radford Sulphur springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.8% 13.2%
Depression 25.7% 24.8%
Smoking 19.1% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 17.5%
Obesity 37.8% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Radford vs Sulphur springs

  • Poor mental health levels are equal in both Radford and Sulphur springs at 19.1%.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Radford at 25.7% compared to 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 19.1% in Radford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur springs at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Radford.
  • Sulphur springs has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 37.8% in Radford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Radford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Radford Sulphur springs
No Schooling 0.1% (11) 0.8% (127)
High School Diploma 6.7% (1,121) 18.3% (3,003)
Less than High School 4.9% (820) 16.0% (2,628)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (3,278) 13.7% (2,248)

Education Levels Comparison: Radford vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Radford.
  • In Sulphur springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 6.7% in Radford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur springs at 16.0%, compared to 4.9% in Radford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Radford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.