Demographics details for Radford, VA vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Radford, VA vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Radford | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,738 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 23.3 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $51,039 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Radford vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 16,738 in Radford.
- The median age in Los angeles is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 23.3 years in Radford.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $51,039 in Radford.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 23.0% in Radford.
- Radford has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 17% in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.6% in Radford.
Demographics
Demographics Radford vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Radford | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 9 |
| White | 82 | 16 |
| Asian | 2 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Radford vs Los angeles
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Radford and Los angeles at 9%.
- Radford has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Radford.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 3% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 4% in Radford.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Radford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Radford | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Radford vs Los angeles
- More residents in Radford report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Radford at 25.7% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Radford at 19.1% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Radford at 16.1% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Radford at 37.8% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Radford at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Radford | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (11) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (1,121) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (820) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (3,278) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Radford vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.1% in Radford.
- In Los angeles, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 6.7% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 4.9% in Radford.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 19.6% in Radford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.