Demographics details for Radford, VA vs Folsom, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Radford, VA vs Folsom, PA.
Data | Radford | Folsom |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,738 | 8,535 |
Median Age | 23.3 years | 37.5 years |
Median Income | $51,039 | $95,048 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Radford vs Folsom
- In Radford, the population is higher at 16,738, compared to 8,535 in Folsom.
- The median age in Folsom is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 23.3 years in Radford.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $95,048, compared to $51,039 in Radford.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 23.0% in Radford.
- Radford has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Radford is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.6% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Radford vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Radford | Folsom |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 5 |
White | 82 | 89 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Radford vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Radford at 9% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 89% compared to 82% in Radford.
- The Asian population is larger in Radford at 2% compared to 0% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Radford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Radford at 4% compared to 2% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Radford and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Radford | Folsom |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 9.8% |
Depression | 25.7% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 31.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Radford vs Folsom
- More residents in Radford report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.5% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Radford at 25.7% compared to 22.1% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Radford at 19.1% compared to 16.1% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 18.5% compared to 16.1% in Radford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Radford at 37.8% compared to 31.2% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Radford at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Radford | Folsom |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (11) | 0.8% (71) |
High School Diploma | 6.7% (1,121) | 19.2% (1,635) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (820) | 10.1% (860) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (3,278) | 20.5% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Radford vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Radford.
- In Folsom, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 6.7% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Folsom at 10.1%, compared to 4.9% in Radford.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 19.6% in Radford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.