Demographics details for Radford, VA vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Radford, VA vs Beaver dam, WI.
| Data | Radford | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,738 | 16,582 |
| Median Age | 23.3 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $51,039 | $65,802 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Radford vs Beaver dam
- In Radford, the population is higher at 16,738, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- The median age in Beaver dam is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 23.3 years in Radford.
- Beaver dam has a higher median income of $65,802, compared to $51,039 in Radford.
- In Beaver dam, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 23.0% in Radford.
- Radford has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Radford is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Radford vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Radford | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 3 |
| White | 82 | 81 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Radford vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Radford at 9% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- Radford has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 81% in Beaver dam.
- Both Radford and Beaver dam have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 4% in Radford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Radford and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Radford | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Radford vs Beaver dam
- More residents in Radford report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.7% in Beaver dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Radford at 25.7% compared to 23.6% in Beaver dam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Radford at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Beaver dam.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 16.1% in Radford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Radford at 37.8% compared to 36.6% in Beaver dam.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Radford and Beaver dam at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Radford | Beaver dam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (11) | 0.3% (47) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (1,121) | 23.8% (3,947) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (820) | 10.3% (1,706) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (3,278) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Radford vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Radford.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 6.7% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 4.9% in Radford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Radford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.