Demographics details for Puryear, TN vs Leominster, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Puryear, TN vs Leominster, MA.
| Data | Puryear | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 705 | 43,646 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $42,857 | $75,620 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Puryear vs Leominster
- The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 705 in Puryear.
- The median age in Leominster is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 40.6 years in Puryear.
- Leominster has a higher median income of $75,620, compared to $42,857 in Puryear.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Puryear at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
- The poverty level is identical in both Puryear and Leominster at 9%.
- Leominster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.1% in Puryear.
Demographics
Demographics Puryear vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Puryear | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 6 |
| White | 80 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Puryear vs Leominster
- In Leominster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 5% in Puryear.
- Puryear has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 67% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Puryear.
- Leominster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 11% in Puryear.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 4% in Puryear.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Puryear and Leominster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Puryear | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.6% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 29.2% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Puryear vs Leominster
- More residents in Puryear report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 17.9% in Leominster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Puryear at 29.2% compared to 23.5% in Leominster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Puryear at 24.8% compared to 15.5% in Leominster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in Puryear.
- Obesity rates are higher in Puryear at 37.9% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Puryear at 31.0% compared to 12.0% in Leominster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Puryear | Leominster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 1.1% (477) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (180) | 18.2% (7,932) |
| Less than High School | 28.4% (200) | 13.5% (5,889) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (55) | 24.1% (10,530) |
Education Levels Comparison: Puryear vs Leominster
- In Leominster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Puryear.
- A higher percentage of residents in Puryear hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 18.2% in Leominster.
- More residents in Puryear have less than a high school education at 28.4% compared to 13.5% in Leominster.
- In Leominster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 7.8% in Puryear.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.