Demographics details for Pulaski, WI vs Stanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pulaski, WI vs Stanton, CA.
| Data | Pulaski | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,045 | 38,952 |
| Median Age | 29.1 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,906 | $76,123 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Pulaski vs Stanton
- The population in Stanton is higher at 38,952, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- The median age in Stanton is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Stanton has a higher median income of $76,123, compared to $65,906 in Pulaski.
- In Stanton, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Stanton.
- Stanton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Pulaski.
Demographics
Demographics Pulaski vs Stanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pulaski | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 84 | 8 |
| Asian | 2 | 26 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pulaski vs Stanton
- In Stanton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 8% in Stanton.
- In Stanton, the Asian population stands at 26%, greater than 2% in Pulaski.
- Stanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanton at 11%, compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pulaski and Stanton at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pulaski | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.7% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pulaski vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pulaski at 22.4% compared to 17.0% in Stanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pulaski at 14.6% compared to 13.0% in Stanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 14.3% in Stanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pulaski at 35.4% compared to 28.4% in Stanton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pulaski at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Stanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pulaski | Stanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (16) | 3.9% (1,532) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (715) | 15.2% (5,904) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (191) | 31.4% (12,250) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (432) | 14.1% (5,475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pulaski vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 0.4% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pulaski hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Stanton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stanton at 31.4%, compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- In Stanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 10.7% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.